andy at hexten.net
Mon Mar 19 22:25:24 GMT 2007
On 19 Mar 2007, at 22:02, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Not quite, Curtis asked and the rest of us said it was ok.
OK. Should it be deleted from the treaty for consistency?
>> It's also rather Perl-centric. D'you mind if I rework it a bit to
>> make it less language specific?
> I'm not sure how relevant to other languages it is as they tend not
> to have
> the same sort of namespace coordination issues we have lacking a
> Archive Network.
That's pretty much what I was going to say. I just want to prefix the
page with a paragraph explaining that it's a Perl-specific issue and
then maybe warn that implementers should consider whether there are
any similar issues with their own languages.
In fact, since I've written that now I've also updated the page.
Andy Armstrong, hexten.net
More information about the tap-l