[tap-l] SKIP_ALL tests should not get hidden
Andy Armstrong
andy at hexten.net
Tue Oct 30 08:56:07 EST 2007
On 30 Oct 2007, at 09:50, Ovid wrote:
> This sounds reasonable. It seems to me that
> TAP::Formatter::Console::Session somewhere should have a line like:
>
> if ( $parser->skip_all ) {
> $formatter->_output( '# SKIP: ' . $parser->skip_all );
> }
>
> Or something like that.
I've added logic that produces output like this:
13:54] andy $ prove t/sample-tests/skipall t/sample-tests/
skipall_nomsg t/sample-tests/simple
t/sample-tests/skipall..........skipped: rope
t/sample-tests/skipall_nomsg....skipped: (no reason given)
t/sample-tests/simple...........ok
All tests successful.
Files=3, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.01 cusr
0.00 csys = 0.03 CPU)
Result: PASS
Do we like that?
> However, TAP::Parser doesn't seem to have a &skip_all method
> (returning boolean or explanation? What if no skip reason given?).
TAP::Parser->skip_all returns a true value if all tests are skipped.
It either returns the skip reason or '(no reason given)' as above.
--
Andy Armstrong, Hexten
More information about the tap-l
mailing list