[tap-l] User Supplied YAML Diagnostic Keys: Descriptive Version
David E. Wheeler
david at kineticode.com
Sat Apr 19 17:17:57 UTC 2008
On Apr 19, 2008, at 08:15, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> #3 is just #2 following an existing cow path. In short, we have a
> good idea that official vs user is going to be a problem. Is anyone
> arguing it won't? We have a simple, elegant solution to it that
> doesn't cause another problem. The cost/benefit ratio is excellent.
> So why wait
So do that. Consensus?
More information about the tap-l