[tap-l] User Supplied YAML Diagnostic Keys: Descriptive Version

David E. Wheeler david at kineticode.com
Sat Apr 19 17:17:57 UTC 2008


On Apr 19, 2008, at 08:15, Michael G Schwern wrote:

> #3 is just #2 following an existing cow path.  In short, we have a  
> good idea that official vs user is going to be a problem.  Is anyone  
> arguing it won't? We have a simple, elegant solution to it that  
> doesn't cause another problem. The cost/benefit ratio is excellent.   
> So why wait

So do that. Consensus?

David


More information about the tap-l mailing list