[tap-l] Test Anything Protocol as an IETF draft/RFC

Jeremiah C. Foster jeremiah.foster at ericsson.com
Thu Jul 10 17:46:47 UTC 2008


On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:32 +0200, Salve J Nilsen wrote:
> Lisa Dusseault said:
> > 
> > Hi Salve,
> >
> > Since you mention the IETF Standards Track specifically, I guess you're 
> > looking for a Proposed Standard RFC that has been published through the 
> > IETF consensus process, which typically involves a Working Group (WG).
> 
> Before continuing this, could we please have a couple of opinions 
> expressed on the topic? (For posteriority, if nothing else.) Some of you 
> have already said something positive (or mumbled something negative,) now 
> let's get it into the archives. :)
> 
> A simple +1, 0 or -1 with reason (the Apache way) should suffice.
> 
>          ------------------======oOo======------------------
> 
> Do we want to work for an IETF stamp of approval (presumably in the form 
> of an RFC someday) on the TAP specification?
> 
> +1
 
+1 - It is already widely used, a standard would be useful.

Jeremiah



More information about the tap-l mailing list