[tap-l] What's with verbose rewriting the TAP?

Andy Armstrong andy at hexten.net
Thu Feb 19 13:49:26 GMT 2009


On 19 Feb 2009, at 13:31, Michael Peters wrote:
> But it really should be the default, IMO. Normalizing data is an  
> extra step that doesn't really give
> any benefit unless you're trying to track down why TAP::Harness is  
> interpreting your TAP as
> something other than you intended, right?


OK :)

-- 
Andy Armstrong, Hexten





More information about the tap-l mailing list